The value of brand identification in sales

24th November 2025 |   Professor Nick Lee and Dr Roland Kassemeier

Your brand’s secret weapon: the salesperson connection you’re probably ignoring.

When a salesperson identifies with the brand, they don’t just work for a company, they see the brand’s wins and losses as personal.

It’s easy as a sales leader, or a field sales rep, to focus on territories, quotas, and compensation plans – but that’s not the whole story. In fact, understanding “brand identification”, which is the connection between salespeople and the brands they represent, can make or break your sales results. More importantly, it’s something you can actually influence, whether you’re a leader or a sales rep, starting today.

What brand identification really means

Brand identification is the degree to which salespeople define themselves by the same attributes that define the brand of the company they work for. When a salesperson identifies with the brand, they don’t just work for a company, they see the brand’s wins and losses as personal. In fact, seminal research by Hughes and Ahearne has demonstrated something remarkable: brand identification increases salesperson effort towards a specific brand and ultimately improves performance, even when compensation systems incentivise competing behaviours.

Think about that. Salespeople will push a brand harder than competitors’ products, regardless of which pays better commissions, if they genuinely identify with what the brand stands for.

The three performance multipliers

Beeler and colleagues’ comprehensive review of salesperson-brand research reveals three distinct ways brand identification transforms performance:

• The Effort Engine. Brand identification drives what researchers call “brand effort”; cognitive, emotional, and physical energy invested specifically into brand goals. This isn’t just working longer hours. It’s salespeople who think about the brand during their commute, who get genuinely excited sharing product updates, who invest mental energy into creative solutions for customers. Across dozens of studies, this effort consistently translates into higher sales performance, better service outcomes, and more creative problem-solving.
• The Resource Builder. Tanner and colleagues’ review confirms that brand identification creates a cascade of psychological resources. More highly brand-identified salespeople show increased organisational commitment, brand attachment, brand advocacy, selling confidence, job satisfaction – and decreased turnover intentions. These aren’t trivial outcomes. Each represents a competitive advantage that compounds over time.
• The Quality Multiplier. Hughes and Ahearne found that brand-identified salespeople don’t just sell more, they also go beyond their formal job duties. They become authentic brand ambassadors, advocating for brand values in ways that exceed typical customer interactions. This “going the extra mile” behaviour creates customer experiences that nonidentified salespeople simply won’t deliver.

The dark side: when the manager-salesperson connection fractures performance

Here’s where it gets really interesting, though, and where most sales leaders miss critical warning signs. Kraus and colleagues examined what happens when sales managers and salespeople differ in how much they identify with the organisation. They studied matched triads of sales managers, salespeople, and customers to understand this “identification tension”.

The results? When managers love the company but salespeople don’t (or vice versa), customer satisfaction and salesperson performance both plummet. The misalignment erodes trust between manager and salesperson, increases role ambiguity and role conflict, and ultimately undermines everything you’re trying to achieve. The damage occurs regardless of who is more identified, it’s the mismatch that destroys performance.

This means hiring for brand identification isn’t enough. You need alignment up and down the management chain. A brand-obsessed manager leading ambivalent salespeople creates just as much damage as an ambivalent manager leading brand-obsessed salespeople.

The unanswered questions about brand connection

Before you sprint off to make everyone “love the brand”, understand this: Beeler and colleagues’ comprehensive 2023 review reveals something sobering. While customer-brand research has extensively explored negative brand relationships, the salesperson-brand literature is mostly silent on potential downsides.

This leaves critical questions unanswered….

The performance paradox. Do salespeople who hold their brands in extremely high regard report increased levels of workaholism, self-righteousness, or egotism? If so, does egotism then undermine their ability to stay customeroriented? Could high levels of workaholism decrease adaptive selling capabilities due to burnout? Beeler and colleagues pose these as essential research questions, noting we may need to explore a level of brand identification that is optimal, rather than aiming to max-out at every turn.

The customer perception problem. Is it the case that very strongly attached salespeople may increase effort but do so to the detriment of customer trust? The question researchers are now grappling with is: does increased effort from strong brand relationships make salespeople come across as pushier, or even “cultish”, to customers? If there’s a dual process at work, where brand relationships boost effort but damage customer perceptions, short-term sales wins could create long-term brand problems.

The burden of being the brand champion. Salespeople who identify strongly with the brand often become the go-to resource for everyone. Managers tap them for training new hires, teammates pull them into complex deals, they field the toughest questions. While identification creates psychological resources, does it simultaneously increase demands to the point where it wipes out the positive effects? Do these highidentifiers burn out faster? These are open questions that need answers.

The organisational ethics dimension. Some research hints that strong brands can “get away” with paying employees less. This raises uncomfortable questions: what else might companies get away with? Would strong brand identification increase tolerance for toxic cultures, inequitable practices, or ethical lapses? The concern is that salespeople with powerful brand attachments may be less likely to accept negative information that challenges their brand beliefs, potentially increasing tolerance for problematic environments.

The point isn’t that brand identification is dangerous in itself, the evidence overwhelmingly shows it drives performance. The point is that we don’t yet fully understand the boundary conditions. We don’t know where “strong identification” tips into “problematic attachment”.

What you should do this week

Despite these cautions, the preponderance of evidence shows that thoughtfully building brand identification drives sustainable performance improvements. Here’s how to start:

For sales leaders:

1. Assess identification gaps. In your next one-on-one, ask: “When you describe what you do at a dinner party, how do you talk about our brand? Do you say, ‘I work for (Company)’ or ‘I sell (products)’?” The language reveals identification levels.
2. Hire for alignment, not just capability. Kraus and colleagues’ findings are clear: you need manager-salesperson identification alignment. When hiring, assess whether candidates’ values align with your brand’s values. When promoting to management, consider not just who hits their numbers, but who genuinely embodies what your brand represents.
3. Build authentic brand experiences. Don’t rely on PowerPoint presentations about “brand values”. Create opportunities for salespeople to experience what makes your brand different: customer site visits, product development exposure, brand history deep-dives. These build genuine identification that presentation decks never will.
4. Monitor for dark-side indicators. Watch for salespeople who seem overly zealous, who can’t acknowledge product limitations, or who alienate customers with excessive enthusiasm. Also protect your high-identifiers from becoming everyone’s go-to resource for every problem. Set boundaries to prevent burnout.

For salespeople:

1. Get curious about your brand. Research your company’s history, talk to long-tenured employees, understand the decisions that shaped your products. Genuine identification comes from understanding, not from trying to manufacture enthusiasm.
2. Find the authentic connection points. Don’t force it. Identify which aspects of your brand genuinely resonate with your personal values. Maybe it’s the innovation; maybe it’s how you serve customers; maybe it’s the company’s position on sustainability. Build from what’s real for you.
3. Balance enthusiasm with customer focus. Remember Beeler and colleagues’ caution: the research is largely silent on how customers perceive strongly brand-identified salespeople. Your job is to solve customer problems, not to evangelise your brand for its own sake. Let identification fuel your effort but keep customer orientation as your north star.
4. Speak up about misalignment. If you sense your manager sees the company differently than you do, address it directly. The research shows this tension damages everyone. Better to surface it and work towards alignment than to let it fester.
5. Protect your wellbeing. If you identify strongly with your brand, you’re likely the person everyone turns to for help. That’s flattering, but it’s also a path to burnout. Set boundaries. Your value comes from sustainable performance, not from being everything to everyone.

Salesperson brand identification is one of the most powerful, and most overlooked, drivers of sales performance.

The identity imperative

The research is unequivocal: salesperson brand identification is one of the most powerful, and most overlooked, drivers of sales performance. It increases effort, builds psychological resources, drives extra-role behaviours, and creates authentic customer experiences that non-identified salespeople simply can’t deliver.

But it’s not a simple “more is better” equation. The emerging evidence on dark-side effects suggests we need to be thoughtful. We need to build genuine identification based on real brand strengths, not manufactured enthusiasm. We need to ensure manager-salesperson alignment, not just individual identification. We need to protect our high-identifiers from the burdens that come with being your brand’s biggest advocates.

Most importantly, we need to recognise that, in an era of infinite customer choice and high salesperson turnover, the psychological connection between your salespeople and your brand isn’t just a nice-to-have. It’s the difference between salespeople who show up for a paycheque and salespeople who show up to build something meaningful.

Which do you think closes more deals?

Dive deeper

This article is based on the following full research papers:

1. Beeler, L, Rouziou, M, and Gyomlai, M D (2023), “When the brand is your bread and butter: Review, synthesis, and directions for future exploration of salespeople-brand relationships”, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 43(4), 270-288.
2. Hughes, D E, and Ahearne, M (2010), “Energizing the reseller’s sales force: The power of brand identification”, Journal of Marketing, 74(4), 81-96.
3. Kraus, F, Haumann, T, Ahearne, M, and Wieseke, J (2015), “When sales managers and salespeople disagree in the appreciation for their firm: The phenomenon of organizational identification tension”, Journal of retailing, 91(3), 486-515.
4. Tanner, E C, Schroeder, C S, and Flaherty, K (2025), “A systematic review of salesperson social identities and identification at work”, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 1-43.

+